[Salon] Iraq feels the pain of America First



Iraq feels the pain of America First

Summary: the decision to pull the plug on USAID has ricochet around the world and in Iraq its impact is being felt most harshly in programmes established to support women and displaced families.

We thank Winthrop Rodgers for today’s newsletter. A journalist and analyst who spent several years in Iraq’s Kurdistan Region, he focusses on politics, human rights, and economics. @wrodgers2

A decision by the Trump administration to pause nearly all spending on foreign aid has sent shockwaves across civil society groups and international NGOs in Iraq. Issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the directive instructed recipient organisations to stop work immediately for at least 90 days pending a review.

“There's just this pool of chaos. People have zero idea what's going on. They have no idea how to deal with it,” an expat NGO worker based in Erbil told Arab Digest a few days after the order was announced.

The US State Department and USAID fund a vast range of activities in Iraq. They support local shelters that take in women fleeing domestic violence and programmes that train entrepreneurs to build a developing private sector. Work to house and reintegrate refugees and IDPs depends on US support, including those from the notorious al-Hol camp in Syria. Independent media outlets struggling to make their voices heard in a highly partisan information landscape benefit from US grant money.

As recently as mid-January, USAID was celebrating the success of a programme to boost the local tourism industry, which the agency said would contribute “to job creation and economic diversification and prosperity.”

That work has now come to a screeching halt. The beneficiaries of US-funded activities are left wondering whether the funding they rely on will ever re-start. Thousands of employees at NGOs are suddenly facing layoffs or long furloughs. Some organisations worry that they will run out of money before the pause ends and will have to close down permanently.

“Arguably every area of aid will be hurt,” the country director for an international NGO based in Iraq said, but added that issues ignored by the local government will lose out. “In Iraq, those two issues are displaced people and women. So displaced people and battered women will be most affected.”


USAID has been active in Iraq since 2003, providing humanitarian assistance, economic development and conflict management, as here in 2008 supporting Shiite Baghdadis and their Sunni neighbours after they had been occupied by ISIS [photo credit: Hugh Sykes]

On January 24, the State Department issued a press release announcing that “Secretary Rubio has paused all US foreign assistance funded by or through the State Department and US Agency for International Development (USAID) for review.” The process will examine whether the programmes are “efficient and consistent with US foreign policy under the America First agenda.” The order applies to nearly every programme and country, including many of Washington’s closest partners.

In one email communication, a USAID administrator told agency staff that “the pause on all foreign assistance means a complete halt…Every program will be thoroughly scrutinised.” The email further warned that “failure to abide by this directive, or any of the directives sent out earlier this week and in the coming weeks, will result in disciplinary action.”

Shortly after the directive became public, stop work orders began arriving in email inboxes in Iraq. Several organisations told Arab Digest that they received them within days of the order. Others found out in subsequent weeks as the effect rippled out through contractors.

“I'm just hearing left, right, and centre that almost every single organisation is affected,” the expat NGO worker said.

At this point, civil society groups, international NGOs, and private sector firms are still scrambling to make sense of the stop work orders and what that means for their operations. For some, US funding represents only a part of its income, but it is often a critical piece of their financial portfolio.

“There’s not clarity yet, but there’s 100% layoffs,” the expat NGO worker said. “It could have implications for non-US programmes because a mass reduction in staffing will then have knock-on effects.”

“I imagine it’s a much more grim story for the individuals who were on the receiving end of this aid,” they added.

The pause and the review of aid programmes will have far-reaching geopolitical effects and potentially harm the standing of the US with some of its closest partners, including Iraq’s strategically important Kurdistan Region.

“On behalf of all the people of Kurdistan, we congratulate President Trump on his return to the White House,” KRG Prime Minister Masrour Barzani said on January 20 at the Davos Forum in Switzerland.

“We hope for continued support in Iraq, particularly in Kurdistan, to safeguard our region, and enhance economic growth,” he added.

It is hard to square that hope with Rubio’s order. While the Kurdistan Region is not targeted specifically by the order—the effect is being felt all over the world—it is hardly helpful.

The development industry is big business, particularly in Erbil. Aid funding funnelled through UN agencies, international NGOs, and local organisations provide thousands of stable and lucrative jobs. The money that those workers spend indirectly supports thousands more.

“Most likely the large INGOs will just leave, consolidate their budgets, and work in fewer places. The smaller NGOs and many Iraqi NGOs that depend on foreign aid for their programming will likely shut down permanently,” said the country director.

The country director felt that there will also be a reputational cost for the Kurdistan Region if civil society stumbles as a result of Washington’s decision to pull funding.

“For the KRG, I think it was even more important to be seen as welcoming to international NGOs and a Western ally—the ‘friendly’ Iraq—while Baghdad’s desire to crush civil society has been more overt in the last few years,” they said, arguing that this would be more difficult to show now.

Withdrawing funding for humanitarian aid and civil society funding comes as Washington is moving to change its military footprint in Iraq. The International Coalition will end its mission by 2026. That same year the Department of Defence’s Memorandum of Understanding to support Peshmerga reform in KRG will also expire, along with US funding.

While many people worry that this will provide an opportunity for Washington’s geopolitical competitors, the immediate injury comes in the form of local impact. Good-paying jobs are being lost, the vital voices in civil society will be muffled, and those who need urgent humanitarian assistance will suffer.

Members can leave comments about this newsletter on the Arab Digest website


follow us on TwitterLinkedIn and Facebook

Copyright © 2025 Arab Digest, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as you are subscribed to the Arab Digest.
Our mailing address is:
Arab Digest
3rd Floor
207 Regent Street
London, W1B 3HH
United Kingdom



 To unsubscribe from this list email editor@arabdigest.org



This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.